So I picked assault rifles (which I've been told was the wrong choice of words...assault weapons would have been proper) and high capacity magazines.
"The goal of this petition is to make illegal the sale of assault rifles and high capacity magazines. While not an indictment of the 2nd Amendment, we feel the time has come to address the ambiguous language allowing citizens the right to bear arms. There can be no practical reason for non-military personnel to own these sorts of armaments."
That's the petition.
A WhiteHouse.gov needs petition needs 150 signatures to make the list on the WH website. It remains hidden up to that point, I guess so that they don't have a rolling list of stupid petitions bumping legitimate ones from the front page. We passed the 150 threshold around 9PM on Saturday, thanks to my friends from WSCR radio, and my fellow Scoreheads.
We wondered if we had a shot at 25,000 signatures within the 30 day window allowed by the White House, after which a petition is removed and must be restarted. If a petition does reach 25,000 signatures, the White House issues a reply.
I checked the petition on Sunday morning, about 12 hours after it first started, and we were up to 1500 signatures. That sort of startled me, although in hindsight I guess it shouldn't have.
We passed the 10,000 signature mark yesterday morning, and the 20,000 signature mark today at about 9AM...and we just passed the 21,000 about 10 seconds ago. A thousand signatures in 90 minutes. Jesus. There are signatures from every state in the union, Washington DC, American Samoa, Puerto Rico, and numerous military bases around the world. Worth noting, the last 4 states to be represented were Montana, Alaska, Wyoming, and South Dakota....the last of which didn't sign in until Sunday night. WTF South Dakota?
Anyway, after crunching some numbers, I came up with this....In 64 1/2 hours we've collected 21,000 signatures. That's 3870 minutes since the petition was first posted. That works out to be 5.4 signatures per minute, every minute, since it went up. That works out to be one signature every 11 seconds.
At this rate, we should pass the 25,000 threshold sometime this afternoon.
http://wh.gov/RsHZ
----------------------
So that was Thursday
-----------------------
We got our reply today....
A Message from President Obama about Your Petition on Reducing Gun Violence
By Bruce ReedIn the days since the tragedy in Newtown, Americans from all over the country have called for action to deter mass shootings and reduce gun violence. Hundreds of thousands of you have signed petitions on the White House's We the People petitions platform.
I'm writing you today to thank you for speaking up, to update you on an important development, and to encourage you to continue engaging with the White House on this critical issue.
On Wednesday, the President outlined a series of first steps we can take to begin the work of ending this cycle of violence. This is what he said:
We
know this is a complex issue that stirs deeply held passions and
political divides. And as I said on Sunday night, there's no law or set
of laws that can prevent every senseless act of violence in our society.
We're going to need to work on making access to mental health care at
least as easy as access to a gun. We're going to need to look more
closely at a culture that all too often glorifies guns and violence. And
any actions we must take must begin inside the home and inside our
hearts.
But
the fact that this problem is complex can no longer be an excuse for
doing nothing. The fact that we can't prevent every act of violence
doesn't mean we can't steadily reduce the violence, and prevent the very
worst violence.
Vice President Biden has been asked to work with members of the
Administration, Congress, and the general public to come up with a set
of concrete policy proposals by next month -- proposals the President
intends to push swiftly. The President asked the Vice President to lead
this effort in part because he wrote and passed the 1994 Crime Bill that
helped law enforcement bring down the rate of violent crime in America.
That bill included the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004.As the Vice President's Chief of Staff, I'm going to do everything I can to ensure we run a process that includes perspectives from all sides of the issue, which is why I wanted to respond to your petition myself. Two decades ago, as domestic policy adviser in the Clinton White House, I first worked with Joe Biden as he fought to enact the Crime Bill, the assault weapons ban, and the Brady Bill. I will never forget what a key role the voices of concerned citizens like you played in that vital process.
The President called on Congress to pass important legislation "banning the sale of military-style assault weapons," "banning the sale of high-capacity ammunition clips," and "requiring background checks before all gun purchases, so that criminals can’t take advantage of legal loopholes to buy a gun from somebody who won’t take the responsibility of doing a background check at all."
An issue this serious and complex isn't going to be resolved with a single legislative proposal or policy prescription. And let's be clear, any action we take will respect the Second Amendment. As the President said:
Look,
like the majority of Americans, I believe that the Second Amendment
guarantees an individual right to bear arms. This country has a strong
tradition of gun ownership that's been handed down from generation to
generation. Obviously across the country there are regional differences.
There are differences between how people feel in urban areas and rural
areas. And the fact is the vast majority of gun owners in America are
responsible -- they buy their guns legally and they use them safely,
whether for hunting or sport shooting, collection or protection.
But
you know what, I am also betting that the majority -- the vast majority
-- of responsible, law-abiding gun owners would be some of the first to
say that we should be able to keep an irresponsible, law-breaking few
from buying a weapon of war. I'm willing to bet that they don't think
that using a gun and using common sense are incompatible ideas -- that
an unbalanced man shouldn't be able to get his hands on a military-style
assault rifle so easily; that in this age of technology, we should be
able to check someone's criminal records before he or she can check out
at a gun show; that if we work harder to keep guns out of the hands of
dangerous people, there would be fewer atrocities like the one in
Newtown -- or any of the lesser-known tragedies that visit small towns
and big cities all across America every day.
So let's continue this conversation and get something meaningful done.
If you have additional ideas and are interested in further engagement with the White House on this issue, please let us know and share your thoughts here:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/share-your-thoughts-reducing-gun-violence
Thank you for speaking out and staying involved.
Bruce Reed is Chief of Staff to Vice President Biden